|
|
Post by Steve Nash on Apr 1, 2016 20:08:13 GMT
|
|
|
Deleted
•
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 1, 2016 20:12:48 GMT
I can't even argue with you anymore. You don't read any of the articles, just look for little bits and take away what you want instead of thinking about it. Whites are divided into three brackets: educated/uneducated, male/female, and location. If you're a white guy uneducated in the south you're voting Republican.(Hence the Hillary winning the same bracket in 08 that Trump is winning now) If you're a white educated male in Nevada chances are you're a Democrat. If you're a female, educated and in Arkansas you probably going to be defined by your age bracket. www.people-press.org/2015/04/07/a-deep-dive-into-party-affiliation/ |
|
|
Deleted
•
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 1, 2016 20:14:03 GMT
Furthermore if you think that Trump is winning the latino vote in primaries (which I didn't infer yet you drew that conclusion) you're just plain wrong. He's not losing them horribly, but he's definitely not winning them over.
|
|
|
|
|
Post by R.I.P. uncle Teddy on Apr 1, 2016 20:17:54 GMT
Furthermore if you think that Trump is winning the latino vote in primaries (which I didn't infer yet you drew that conclusion) you're just plain wrong. He's not losing them horribly, but he's definitely not winning them over. I didn't draw that conclusion??? You're not even arguing with what I'm saying. You're arguing something else.  |
|
|
Deleted
•
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 1, 2016 20:22:25 GMT
I'm arguing like you now.
I don't read all of posts, I just argue some stuff you say
|
|
|
|
|
Post by R.I.P. uncle Teddy on Apr 1, 2016 20:23:53 GMT
I'm arguing like you now. I don't read all of posts, I just argue some stuff you say That's what you were doing originally doe.  |
|
|
Deleted
•
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 1, 2016 20:26:00 GMT
Very true, responding to you saying he's winning democrats, and I responding with "yeah but the ones he's winning aren't really democrats. They're "democrats" in that they are registered ones who typically vote Republican in Republican states and furthermore they're only a small fraction of his base"
Is totally not arguing your point.
|
|
|
|
|
Post by R.I.P. uncle Teddy on Apr 1, 2016 20:31:13 GMT
I dont agree with them being "democrats". They are literally registered democrats. No one registers for a party they dont support.
|
|
|
|
|
Post by R.I.P. uncle Teddy on Apr 1, 2016 20:32:30 GMT
Those werent really the people I was talking about anyway.
|
|
|
Deleted
•
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 1, 2016 20:33:43 GMT
Gonna change my registration status to Republican. Never gonna vote that way probably, but hey I'll be a registered one and that's all that matters!
|
|
|
Deleted
•
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 1, 2016 23:40:08 GMT
Furthermore if you think that Trump is winning the latino vote in primaries (which I didn't infer yet you drew that conclusion) you're just plain wrong. He's not losing them horribly, but he's definitely not winning them over. What about Cubans and generally non messicans? Is there a hatred toward him in other latino groups other than Mexicans? |
|
|
|
|
Post by fpliii on Apr 2, 2016 1:54:24 GMT
Any of you play Democracy 3 on Steam? Fun game.
|
|
|
Deleted
•
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2016 11:57:43 GMT
Any of you play Democracy 3 on Steam? Fun game. used to play it. modded the shit out of it. AT the end I couldn't even recognize the game with all the mods I had. |
|
|
|
|
Post by fpliii on Apr 2, 2016 15:13:57 GMT
Any of you play Democracy 3 on Steam? Fun game. used to play it. modded the shit out of it. AT the end I couldn't even recognize the game with all the mods I had. I installed a bunch of mods, but I think they affected the balance a bit, so I've uninstalled a few that break gameplay (a few are incompatible with one another too). For awhile I wanted to add a lot of countries/policies, but some of them are very well done (Gikgik's in particular). |
|
|
Tom Is Dead
•
Irish Lass Kicker
Posts: 13,008
Likes: 8,196
:: I'll never love again
My World
Is
Ending
|
Post by Tom Is Dead on Apr 2, 2016 16:48:01 GMT
Furthermore if you think that Trump is winning the latino vote in primaries (which I didn't infer yet you drew that conclusion) you're just plain wrong. He's not losing them horribly, but he's definitely not winning them over. What about Cubans and generally non messicans? Is there a hatred toward him in other latino groups other than Mexicans? Not at all, or rather not anywhere to the same degree. But overall that demographic is more likely to lean towards the left. |
|
|
|
|
Post by R.I.P. uncle Teddy on Apr 3, 2016 6:52:57 GMT
 This really disgusts me. |
|
|
Deleted
•
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 3, 2016 8:01:35 GMT
used to play it. modded the shit out of it. AT the end I couldn't even recognize the game with all the mods I had. I installed a bunch of mods, but I think they affected the balance a bit, so I've uninstalled a few that break gameplay (a few are incompatible with one another too). For awhile I wanted to add a lot of countries/policies, but some of them are very well done (Gikgik's in particular). What mods are you using? |
|
|
Deleted
•
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 3, 2016 15:43:23 GMT
This really disgusts me. I posted that on /r/politics and it got removed  |
|
|
|
|
Post by ProfessorMurder on Apr 3, 2016 16:14:22 GMT
This really disgusts me. It disgusts you that he made a statement 35 years ago where he didn't shit on helping people, but instead thought people should be helped via an alternate mean? What a fucking prick! |
|
|
|
|
Post by R.I.P. uncle Teddy on Apr 3, 2016 18:01:57 GMT
This really disgusts me. It disgusts you that he made a statement 35 years ago where he didn't shit on helping people, but instead thought people should be helped via an alternate mean? What a fucking prick! Its disgusting that he somehow convinced himself that forceful redistribution is a more morally sound system than willingly helping people. It takes huge distortions of logic for it to make any sense. |
|
|
Deleted
•
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 3, 2016 18:03:55 GMT
It disgusts you that he made a statement 35 years ago where he didn't shit on helping people, but instead thought people should be helped via an alternate mean? What a fucking prick! Its disgusting that he somehow convinced himself that forceful redistribution is a more morally sound system than willingly helping people. It takes huge distortions of logic for it to make any sense. You sure like drawing conclusions from small bits of information! |
|
|
|
|
Post by R.I.P. uncle Teddy on Apr 3, 2016 18:07:53 GMT
Its disgusting that he somehow convinced himself that forceful redistribution is a more morally sound system than willingly helping people. It takes huge distortions of logic for it to make any sense. You sure like drawing conclusions from small bits of information! I really dont know what other conclusion can be drawn when he says "I dont like charities, they should be replaced by government." I mean....there is a single logical conclusion...hes plainly stating what I said... |
|
|
Deleted
•
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 3, 2016 18:08:18 GMT
There's a shit ton of evidence that Sanders is so left he's in communist territory
|
|
|
Deleted
•
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 3, 2016 18:09:29 GMT
You sure like drawing conclusions from small bits of information! I really dont know what other conclusion can be drawn when he says "I dont like charities, they should be replaced by government." I mean....there is a single logical conclusion...hes plainly stating what I said... How about the fact that there are multiple billion dollar charities that only actually spend pennies on every dollar they get towards Theo cause? Why is it so crazy to be against regulating that |
|
|
|
|
Post by R.I.P. uncle Teddy on Apr 3, 2016 18:11:21 GMT
I really dont know what other conclusion can be drawn when he says "I dont like charities, they should be replaced by government." I mean....there is a single logical conclusion...hes plainly stating what I said... How about the fact that there are multiple billion dollar char I yo that only actually spend pennies on every dollar they get towards Theo cause? Why is it so crazy to be against regulating that He questions "The fundamental concepts on which charities are based." Thats straight from the article. Its very very clear this isnt about regulation. He dislikes the very idea of charities. |
|
|
Deleted
•
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 3, 2016 18:13:18 GMT
How about the fact that there are multiple billion dollar char I yo that only actually spend pennies on every dollar they get towards Theo cause? Why is it so crazy to be against regulating that He questions "The fundamental concepts on which charities are based." Thats straight from the article. Its very very clear this isnt about regulation. He dislikes the very idea of charities. I completely understand that opinion. I'm sure you're aware if the corruption in Susan komen, American Cancer fund, and a bunch of others that I can't remember off the top of my head. People are greedy and will take advantage of other peoples charity |
|
|
|
|
Post by R.I.P. uncle Teddy on Apr 3, 2016 18:17:33 GMT
He questions "The fundamental concepts on which charities are based." Thats straight from the article. Its very very clear this isnt about regulation. He dislikes the very idea of charities. I completely understand that opinion. I'm sure you're aware if the corruption in Susan komen, American Cancer fund, and a bunch of others that I can't remember off the top of my head. People are greedy and will take advantage of other peoples charity Statisticay, good charities are a far more effective system of redistribution in terms of how much money goes directly to other people than government. And, hes clearly not talking about charities like that. This piece was written in 1981, susan g wasnt founded until 82. Youre going way out of you way to defend what is clearly just an ignorant opinion based on the marxist ideology he loves. |
|
|
Deleted
•
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 3, 2016 18:18:07 GMT
That's probably why he won't release his tax forms from the last like 7 years. Probably doesn't give much to charities. Got something to hide.
|
|
|
Deleted
•
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 3, 2016 18:20:28 GMT
I completely understand that opinion. I'm sure you're aware if the corruption in Susan komen, American Cancer fund, and a bunch of others that I can't remember off the top of my head. People are greedy and will take advantage of other peoples charity Statisticay, good charities are a far more effective system of redistribution in terms of how much money goes directly to other people than government. And, hes clearly not talking about charities like that. This piece was written in 1981, susan g wasnt founded until 82. Youre going way out of you way to defend what is clearly just an ignorant opinion based on the marxist ideology he loves. I'm giving you current examples, use Google I'm sure you'll find older examples too. But I lean towards agreeing with you anyway. |
|
|
Deleted
•
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 3, 2016 18:21:21 GMT
Post up some charity stats, I'm actually interested in the distribution for different sectors
|
|
|
