Reply

Why not have Trump, Cruz, Bernie, and Hillary ALL on the bal

« Prev
1
Next »

R U THICK • Alright Posts: 12 Likes: 3	Post by R U THICK on May 5, 2016 20:35:37 GMT Ballot* These are obviously four very different candidates with sizable support. Most Americans are sick of party bullshit. Why do we have to crown one person from each party to have square off in some media hyped social spectacle? Just so it's easier for the mob think masses? Why not have four-way debates? And a four-way ballot? Anyone have a good reason?

Why not have Trump, Cruz, Bernie, and Hillary ALL on the bal Posted on May 5, 2016 20:35:37 GMT via mobile Edited by R U THICK May 5, 2016 20:36:17 GMT Quote Select Post Deselect Post Link to Post Member Give Gift Back to Top

Hellfire Missile Pack • Neo Atomic Cataclysmic Jet Giga Cannon Posts: 81,261 Likes: 29,884 :: Politely kill all humans 80/64/64 H̔̐̊ͮͮ̇̐ͦ̒͑ͧ̑ͥ̽̎ͭ͐̚̕͏҉̧̭̜͈̗Ơ̈ͨ̄͂̈́ͬ͂͌͊́͂ͯ̄̄ͧ̒̚͜҉̫͍̻̦͇̱̞̝͝ͅL̷̡̧̤̫̥̤̪͚̫͇̳̠̟̟̏̿̽ͪ̑̇͂̿̑̆̉ͣ̚̚͜͞ͅͅỲ̴̨̨͕̯̭͙̱̖̜̋̃̌ͤ̀͞ ̵̳̱̣͙̤̠͇̠̮͍̲̫͉̊ͥ̾̇ͧ̉͐̂͂̀͡F̵̶͚̩̟̹̗͓͎̜̺̐̑̈́ͥͣ͛̿ͯ̽̍̃ͥͮ͐̓̋́̚U̡̥̬̱̼͔ͥ̀̑͗͊̇̌̅́̏̈́ͬ̄̌̀͞Ç̞̼̤̰̮͍̱̜ͩ͑͑͆ͣ̌̅ͧ͒̏̎ͧ̈́̔ͥ̉͂̚͜͡͡͞K̸̡̖̹͇̺͆͌ͬ͂̄̓͊̃ͧ̅ͦ̃̌͢͟ ̧͚̼͈̪̹͖̖͈̲͉̗̻̼̱̈͋̿̽͛̄̄̋ͭͯ̊̉̑̎͒͐͂ͭ͘T̵̷̮͕̤̘͇͓̠̭͚͎͍̥̲̥͛ͯ̏̐͂ͬ̈́͊̔͊ͩ̏̋̓ͩ́͒̽͘͟H̴̤̖̻̬̰ͫͩ̈ͯͧ̒ͬ̔̄́̀͜͟ͅI̧͑ͮͭ̊̊̿͂͑̊ͩ̓ͬ̇̀̚͟͏̻̘̩̤̖̰̜̗̣̙̗̥̘̭̫̭͈͟ͅS̡̛̗̗͇̹̱̹̯͖͙̫̜̝͎̞̳̿̑̉ͮ͂̃͊ͪ͗͗͆̒͊ͩ́̆ ͥͫͮ̑̅́ͩ̃͂͋̈̽̾ͫ̔̿ͥ̀҉̸̞͇̻͈̥͍̜͕̭̞I̘̬̘͇͈̥̬͈̬̰͇̠ͥͩͩ͂̒͗ͫͯͭ́̄̒̋̈́́̀́͝S̪͈͓̪͈̝͔̱̞͙̩̣̭̰̬̗ͫ͌̐ͭ͗̂ͨ̊͒̆͐̃̒̕̕ ̿̏̐͋ͭ̽ͤ̄͌̂͑̏ͬ̓̑̅͡҉͙̻̫̳͝U̝̲̟͎͎̰͙̺̮̲̠̙̙͕̘̓̀̿ͨͤ̃̋̒̄ͬͣ̆́͘͟͡ͅṊ̛̛̥̱̦͓͎͕̼͍̰͚̝͉ͪ͆ͣ͋ͦ̂̇̉̐ͫͣ͂̚͢ͅRͦ̓͛̿͆́ͧ͌̔͆҉҉̴̛͖̜̭̘̘̦̟̯̗͇͓̘̼̩͔̭̰ͅȨ̢̜͖̪̪̺̗͉̥̖̦̿̉̾ͭ͌́ͫͬͨ́̒̄̂Ą̲̜̙̹̯͋̏̉͑͜͡D̘͖͚͕̖̦̜̯̘̥̳̖͈̙̈́̎ͮͬͩ͞͡A̷͔̩͇͍̳̭ͬͧ̐̈͛ͤ̈̓͐ͬͨͧ̇̈̈ͬͨ̾̊͢͡B̢̼̦͇͉̻̥̪̫͚̱̩̗͖̯͓̫͔ͮͬͤͥ͂ͯ̎̈́̃́̋ͬ͆̐ͣ̈ͯ̋ͅL̩͙͈̩͚ͦ̅ͧ̏́̍͐͑̅̍ͤ̚͜͡Ę̭̗̲̻͙̩̟͍̯̠̟̟̖̯͙̥͙͌̉̿ͯͫͬ͂ͦ͑̿ͤͥ͡͠͞	Post by Hellfire Missile Pack on May 5, 2016 20:41:46 GMT I like the ballot idea, but the problem I believe is the system has already been established to make it difficult to have any significant changes (at least quicker changes for the short term). There are dues paid by the politicians, which sets up a chain reaction of connections, rules, obligations,etc. It could also mess up their campaign funding if they don't want to spend more of their own money, but I don't mind that at all.
	[/img]http://signavatar.com/51059_s.gif[/img] SPOILER: Click to show [/img]https://i.imgur.com/txrzqhw.png[/img][/spoiler] [/img]http://i.imgur.com/KU48QIk.png?1[/img]
Why not have Trump, Cruz, Bernie, and Hillary ALL on the bal Posted on May 5, 2016 20:41:46 GMT Quote Select Post Deselect Post Link to Post Member Give Gift Back to Top

Don Rumata • Strong Man Posts: 6,964 Likes: 3,705	Post by Don Rumata on May 6, 2016 5:40:50 GMT , that's more democratic see Swiss Federal Council
	#1
Why not have Trump, Cruz, Bernie, and Hillary ALL on the bal Posted on May 6, 2016 5:40:50 GMT Quote Select Post Deselect Post Link to Post Member Give Gift Back to Top

Draz • Legend Posts: 1,056 Likes: 221	Post by Draz on May 6, 2016 13:20:01 GMT Split votes perhaps?
	I'm a big fan of the New York Knicks & anal.
Why not have Trump, Cruz, Bernie, and Hillary ALL on the bal Posted on May 6, 2016 13:20:01 GMT via mobile Quote Select Post Deselect Post Link to Post Member Give Gift Back to Top

fpliii • Full Member Posts: 439 Likes: 124	Post by fpliii on May 6, 2016 13:44:14 GMT If nobody gets 270, goes to a vote by the House, with the top 3 on the ballot. Would need to change the electoral process to allow a plurality (and not necessarily a majority) to win for more than two parties to be viable.

Why not have Trump, Cruz, Bernie, and Hillary ALL on the bal Posted on May 6, 2016 13:44:14 GMT via mobile Edited by fpliii May 6, 2016 13:46:22 GMT Quote Select Post Deselect Post Link to Post Member Give Gift Back to Top