I don't know how mistreated he was, but he killed 77 people. He doesn't deserve to earn any money.

He didn't receive any money per see. His court fees were paid by the state since he won the case. Had he lost the trial he would have had to pay.

Killed 77 people, mostly children. Who cares how he's treated?

I get your rational, but that is not how it is, sadly.

death sentences don't stop crime at all

never did, never will

only savage countries still got the death penalty

It's not about stopping, it's about crime and punishment. Dude killed 70+ teenagers and here we are debating his rights.

He wasn't in need of money. Breiveik was actually rich and he hated socialism, that's why he attacked children at a socialist camp.

You are not very bright, are you?

Exactly, if law allows mass murderers so much leeway, there's something wrong with it.

I am not the retard that thinks the reason he hasn't been put down is because of political reason like Scandinavia being too liberal. If you want go around around preaching murder than that's you, we left that behind centuries ago, and going back would be taking a step in the wrong direction.

If you wanted to discuss this particular verdict, as to where they judges maybe have deliberated wring or something else then sure, but you come here with your nick young like post and say shit like "breivik wins money blå blå bla". In your opinion we should just throw away his constitutional right just because you can't stop for a second to think with something other than your emotions?

Two wrongs doesn't make a right,

Further one preaching about Guantanamo Bay is even more ridiculous, there is so many prisoners in Guantanamo that are held despite being innocent, they have no chance for trial and they are treated like pigs.

Law is law, but he should have lost his rights to sue when he broke the law mass murdering people and there is without a doubt that he's the shooter. Put those two in conjunction. If he was maybe the mass murderer and there was a reasonable doubt, then sure, there is a better argument

Of course, this is an extreme case scenario, which makes this easy to say this. When it comes to a case by case basis where lets say the murderer shot 9 people, then comes the difficulty in quantifying what is mass murder and how much rights should they have depending on the victims killed (or maybe injured)

So you want them to rebuild their constitution and break against European convention just because of one man? This is America in a nutshell , had one terror attack, granted it was a big one, that sadly costed the life of thousands of people, what do they do? They rile up the people to support a war that has now killed hindered of thousands and costed more than trillions and trillions of dollars. Furthermore they use it as an excuse to spy on their own citizens.


They have laws that for the most part works, this was an exception, this has never happened before, we obviously don't have laws as what to do with a man that decides to go and kill 77bpeople., for the record despite Scandinavias lax punishments the rate of recidivism is million times lower than America where the punishment is hard as fuck. So we are the ones that are doing something right with out punishment and rehabilitation, not America.

People think breivik is living some lavish life, the man has been isolated for 23 hours a day for five years. With one of the hours where ha had a chance to run on a treadmill but not before being bodily visited naked.

I know for you nerds being able to sit in your room for 23 hours a day and play video games is the dream, but I can't even imagine how that is.

He has in letters begged to get the capital punishment instead of being kept isolated like this. I reapet, he literally begged to be murdered. If we hypothetically assume there is no after life, no heaven and no hell he is right now sitting and rotting in a room for 23 hours a day doing nothing at all.

People who think capital punishment is worse than that are crazy.