|
|
Post by ballup on Jun 22, 2016 15:16:56 GMT
Any chance they get K-Love now or do the Cavs keep him? I think the Cavs will (and should) retain Kevin Love Dont think the Celts will. Cavs will want to keep "a good thing" going |
|
|
|
|
Post by Lampz on Jun 23, 2016 13:07:04 GMT
let's hope we nab a star tonight
|
|
|
|
|
Post by Admiral on Jun 24, 2016 8:24:03 GMT
I like Brown, hopefully something amazing happens in this Free Agency.
|
|
|
Deleted
•
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 14, 2016 4:03:30 GMT
Love my Celtics fam
|
|
|
|
|
Post by bladefd on Jul 14, 2016 6:55:50 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
Post by bladefd on Jun 12, 2017 6:26:00 GMT
LampzGordon Hayward's wife posting a pic of their daughter wearing shirt saying "GO GREEN!" with a shamrock:  Potentially congrats are in the order, shadeypoo?!?!?! Your boy coming to Boston?
|
|
|
|
|
Post by Admiral on Aug 23, 2017 5:48:11 GMT
NBA Championship incoming? Lewl
|
|
|
|
|
Post by bladefd on Aug 23, 2017 6:25:52 GMT
So glad to hear that shade is also a Warriors fan now. Wow, so many of us Warriors fans on here! Rosez, me, shade all Warriors fans. We love our Warriors! WARRRRRIORS. WARRRRRIORS. WARRRRRIORS.
|
|
|
|
|
Post by Lampz on Aug 23, 2017 11:31:42 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
Post by bladefd on Dec 17, 2017 22:28:14 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
Post by bladefd on Dec 17, 2017 22:34:24 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
Post by Lampz on Dec 17, 2017 23:00:45 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
Post by bladefd on Dec 18, 2017 20:57:37 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
Post by Lampz on Dec 18, 2017 21:04:38 GMT
IT was better last season for sure
|
|
|
|
|
Post by bladefd on Dec 19, 2017 2:33:22 GMT
Still miss IT, Lampz? After Kyrie just saved your asses once again keeping you guys in the game vs pacers |
|
|
|
|
Post by Heisenberg on Dec 24, 2017 2:01:34 GMT
Boston is the best
Fuck the Lakers
|
|
|
|
|
Post by bladefd on Dec 26, 2017 2:32:20 GMT
Boston is the best Fuck the Lakers  |
|
|
|
|
Post by Heisenberg on Dec 26, 2017 8:24:39 GMT
Boston is the best Fuck the Lakers 2008 |
|
|
|
|
Post by bladefd on Dec 26, 2017 21:09:51 GMT
It's the latest one that counts! =P Besides, Celtics didn't even make the eastern conference finals in the middle year! Pierce, Rondo, Ray not good enough to get past the hapless Magic, who the Lakers made look like scrubs in finals. Lakers in 3 finals in a row kekeke. Lakers clearly more successful against superior teams in the west. Eat that, broski! |
|
|
|
|
Post by bladefd on Jan 28, 2018 21:02:55 GMT
Now Celtics fans will finally stop saying IT was better than Kyrie last couple years. Sorry folks, but Kyrie is just better and always been better. ^_^ Under LeBron ball: Kyrie > IT ... IT looks horrendous while Kyrie was balling Under Boston system: Kyrie > IT ... Kyrie plays vastly better defense, more than makes up for the slight advantage IT had offensively Overall player considering all-around game including offense and defense: Kyrie >>>>> IT, not even close the moment you bring defense into the equation Isaiah Thomas:  Kyrie Irving:   |
|
|
|
|
Post by ballup on Jan 29, 2018 0:42:26 GMT
Why do you post so much on the Celtics thread and why are all your posts so bad bladefd? |
|
|
|
|
Post by bladefd on Jan 29, 2018 7:35:11 GMT
Why do you post so much on the Celtics thread and why are all your posts so bad bladefd? Do you disagree, ballybaby? Where do you disagree? Please educate me, my good friend =( |
|
|
|
|
Post by ballup on Jan 29, 2018 13:02:42 GMT
Why do you post so much on the Celtics thread and why are all your posts so bad bladefd? Do you disagree, ballybaby? Where do you disagree? Please educate me, my good friend =( They're bad because you assume everyone has the same opinion and you're bragging about one guy player better than someone who was injured for 2/3s of a year |
|
|
|
|
Post by bladefd on Jan 29, 2018 18:59:58 GMT
Do you disagree, ballybaby? Where do you disagree? Please educate me, my good friend =( They're bad because you assume everyone has the same opinion and you're bragging about one guy player better than someone who was injured for 2/3s of a year My opinions are bad because I assume everyone has the same opinion. Are you saying my opinions are objectively bad or bad based on your opinion? So you want me to have the same opinion as you in order for you to consider my opinion good? So you do think everyone must have the same opinion as you or else the opinion is automatically bad? So what good is your opinion if you say mine is bad and what good is my opinion if I say yours is bad? (I hope you got a headache reading that because that was my goal =] ) Okay, let's see if Cavs ever look as good consistently with IT as they did with Kyrie. That team has pretty much the same roster except they added Wade, IT and Crowder. Wade has been pretty good off the bench. Crowder has been ehhhh so so but not anywhere as bad as IT. What we do know for sure is that IT will never play as well defensively with Cavs as Kyrie. But I still will give you the benefit of the doubt to end of the season. (Notice how I am comparing IT with Cavs & Kyrie with Cavs then IT with Celtics & Kyrie with Celtics. Kyrie is already as good with Celtics as IT was overall with Celtics.) |
|
|
|
|
Post by ballup on Jan 29, 2018 21:01:07 GMT
They're bad because you assume everyone has the same opinion and you're bragging about one guy player better than someone who was injured for 2/3s of a year My opinions are bad because I assume everyone has the same opinion. Are you saying my opinions are objectively bad or bad based on your opinion? So you want me to have the same opinion as you in order for you to consider my opinion good? So you do think everyone must have the same opinion as you or else the opinion is automatically bad? So what good is your opinion if you say mine is bad and what good is my opinion if I say yours is bad? (I hope you got a headache reading that because that was my goal =] ) Okay, let's see if Cavs ever look as good consistently with IT as they did with Kyrie. That team has pretty much the same roster except they added Wade, IT and Crowder. Wade has been pretty good off the bench. Crowder has been ehhhh so so but not anywhere as bad as IT. What we do know for sure is that IT will never play as well defensively with Cavs as Kyrie. But I still will give you the benefit of the doubt to end of the season. (Notice how I am comparing IT with Cavs & Kyrie with Cavs then IT with Celtics & Kyrie with Celtics. Kyrie is already as good with Celtics as IT was overall with Celtics.) You assumed all Celtics fans argued IT being better than Kyrie and then you go parading around like a jackass when IT produces poorly coming into a sinking ship situation. On top of that, IT is not in peak shape and may never be in peak shape again. You must really be a Kyrie fan as noted by your try hard attempt to be an intellectual. |
|
|
|
|
Post by bladefd on Jan 30, 2018 0:53:18 GMT
My opinions are bad because I assume everyone has the same opinion. Are you saying my opinions are objectively bad or bad based on your opinion? So you want me to have the same opinion as you in order for you to consider my opinion good? So you do think everyone must have the same opinion as you or else the opinion is automatically bad? So what good is your opinion if you say mine is bad and what good is my opinion if I say yours is bad? (I hope you got a headache reading that because that was my goal =] ) Okay, let's see if Cavs ever look as good consistently with IT as they did with Kyrie. That team has pretty much the same roster except they added Wade, IT and Crowder. Wade has been pretty good off the bench. Crowder has been ehhhh so so but not anywhere as bad as IT. What we do know for sure is that IT will never play as well defensively with Cavs as Kyrie. But I still will give you the benefit of the doubt to end of the season. (Notice how I am comparing IT with Cavs & Kyrie with Cavs then IT with Celtics & Kyrie with Celtics. Kyrie is already as good with Celtics as IT was overall with Celtics.) You assumed all Celtics fans argued IT being better than Kyrie and then you go parading around like a jackass when IT produces poorly coming into a sinking ship situation. On top of that, IT is not in peak shape and may never be in peak shape again. You must really be a Kyrie fan as noted by your try hard attempt to be an intellectual. You sound a bit mad that I keep downplaying IT's contributions with Celtics and saying he was never as good as Kyrie once we consider IT's lack of defense. I'm not sure what is there to even disagree with - maybe I'm being too harsh on IT, but defense is 50% of the game. I have been very consistent on the importance of defense as it pertains to IT or Lonzo in their own right and valuing defense on same equal scale as offense  If anything, it's a testament to the trade Celtics pulled off. I remember folks saying Cavs won that trade, but I kept refuting that point on ish & even here to shade. That was a great trade all along as we see now come into fruition. IT was and is a 1-dimensional player (very good at that, no doubt) with no long-term potential as a starter for a championship contender - that much should be clear. |
|
|
|
|
Post by ballup on Jan 30, 2018 14:02:46 GMT
You assumed all Celtics fans argued IT being better than Kyrie and then you go parading around like a jackass when IT produces poorly coming into a sinking ship situation. On top of that, IT is not in peak shape and may never be in peak shape again. You must really be a Kyrie fan as noted by your try hard attempt to be an intellectual. You sound a bit mad that I keep downplaying IT's contributions with Celtics and saying he was never as good as Kyrie once we consider IT's lack of defense. I'm not sure what is there to even disagree with - maybe I'm being too harsh on IT, but defense is 50% of the game. I have been very consistent on the importance of defense as it pertains to IT or Lonzo in their own right and valuing defense on same equal scale as offense If anything, it's a testament to the trade Celtics pulled off. I remember folks saying Cavs won that trade, but I kept refuting that point on ish & even here to shade. That was a great trade all along as we see now come into fruition. IT was and is a 1-dimensional player (very good at that, no doubt) with no long-term potential as a starter for a championship contender - that much should be clear. You miss more points than Robert Sacre ever did in the post. I'm not mad that Kyrie was/is better than IT because I've always had the opinion Kyrie was the better player. I'm teethed that you‘re going steps beyond normal conversation or banter to troll. It's not even creative trolling or jabbing. The stuff I'm seeing is what I'd expect out of a 5th grader. Seriously, are you a pre-teen? Even Shade acts more mature than this. It's quite disturbing |
|
|
|
|
Post by bladefd on Jan 30, 2018 20:30:34 GMT
You sound a bit mad that I keep downplaying IT's contributions with Celtics and saying he was never as good as Kyrie once we consider IT's lack of defense. I'm not sure what is there to even disagree with - maybe I'm being too harsh on IT, but defense is 50% of the game. I have been very consistent on the importance of defense as it pertains to IT or Lonzo in their own right and valuing defense on same equal scale as offense If anything, it's a testament to the trade Celtics pulled off. I remember folks saying Cavs won that trade, but I kept refuting that point on ish & even here to shade. That was a great trade all along as we see now come into fruition. IT was and is a 1-dimensional player (very good at that, no doubt) with no long-term potential as a starter for a championship contender - that much should be clear. You miss more points than Robert Sacre ever did in the post. I'm not mad that Kyrie was/is better than IT because I've always had the opinion Kyrie was the better player. I'm teethed that you‘re going steps beyond normal conversation or banter to troll. It's not even creative trolling or jabbing. The stuff I'm seeing is what I'd expect out of a 5th grader. Seriously, are you a pre-teen? Even Shade acts more mature than this. It's quite disturbing You sound pretty upset for whatever reason (even though we seem to agree concerning the overall points concerning IT/Kyrie) so I will let you be to yourself. Maybe we will continue this conversation in the future when you shimmer down a bit and have some time to self-reflect. Until then, see ya. |
|
|
|
|
Post by ballup on Jan 31, 2018 1:39:48 GMT
You miss more points than Robert Sacre ever did in the post. I'm not mad that Kyrie was/is better than IT because I've always had the opinion Kyrie was the better player. I'm teethed that you‘re going steps beyond normal conversation or banter to troll. It's not even creative trolling or jabbing. The stuff I'm seeing is what I'd expect out of a 5th grader. Seriously, are you a pre-teen? Even Shade acts more mature than this. It's quite disturbing You sound pretty upset for whatever reason (even though we seem to agree concerning the overall points concerning IT/Kyrie) so I will let you be to yourself. Maybe we will continue this conversation in the future when you shimmer down a bit and have some time to self-reflect. Until then, see ya. I rather you not continue. Your utter denseness makes this conversation such a migraine |
|
|
|
|
Post by bladefd on Jun 12, 2019 19:50:47 GMT
"They can trade for him, but it'll be for one year. I mean: If the Celtics traded for Anthony Davis, we would go there and we would abide by our contractual [obligations] and we would go into free agency in 2020. I've stated that to them. But in the event that he decides to walk away and you give away assets? Don't blame Rich Paul." -Rich Paul  Kyrie gone   |
|
|
