|
|
Post by R.I.P. uncle Teddy on Mar 16, 2016 18:09:28 GMT
|
|
|
Lampz
•
Lebron23
Posts: 51,202
Likes: 20,652
|
Post by Lampz on Mar 16, 2016 18:14:14 GMT
Zoo wee mama.
They gonna have to call this Indiana Jones and the Comfortable Chair.
Still hype as fuck doe.
|
|
|
Deleted
•
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 16, 2016 18:28:40 GMT
No Chris Pratt?
No Rosez.
|
|
|
|
|
Post by Bandito. on Mar 16, 2016 18:30:22 GMT
What is he looking for now? His diaper in the nursing home?
|
|
|
Lampz
•
Lebron23
Posts: 51,202
Likes: 20,652
|
Post by Lampz on Mar 16, 2016 18:45:03 GMT
Chris Pratt  |
|
|
Deleted
•
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 16, 2016 18:45:46 GMT
Greatest actor of our times
|
|
|
|
|
Post by R.I.P. uncle Teddy on Mar 16, 2016 19:00:25 GMT
This is our mod. End the tyrrany. |
|
|
Lampz
•
Lebron23
Posts: 51,202
Likes: 20,652
|
Post by Lampz on Mar 17, 2016 23:29:45 GMT
I'm having a hard time seeing old man Ford pulling off the action stunts he did in Kingdom, and they were already pushing it in 2008.
But since they're dead-set on bringing him back, I wouldn't mind the idea of presenting parallel dramas, one focusing on the last adventure of Indiana Jones in 1968, and one being a prequel focusing on the journey of a young recasted Indy becoming the man we see in Raiders of the Lost Ark. The stories could even connect to each other, the latter having an effect that ripples on into the former's story.
Disney doesn't hate money enough to end the franchise here.
|
|
|
|
|
Post by R.I.P. uncle Teddy on Mar 17, 2016 23:30:59 GMT
Recasting Indiana would be awful.
|
|
|
Lampz
•
Lebron23
Posts: 51,202
Likes: 20,652
|
Post by Lampz on Mar 17, 2016 23:34:54 GMT
Recasting Indiana would be awful. Wrong. You're just not open-minded enough. Rosez knows. Kind of. |
|
|
Lampz
•
Lebron23
Posts: 51,202
Likes: 20,652
|
Post by Lampz on Mar 17, 2016 23:36:59 GMT
It wouldn't be as offensive as recasting Han Solo.
And that's already happening.
|
|
|
|
|
Post by R.I.P. uncle Teddy on Mar 17, 2016 23:37:59 GMT
Recasting Indiana would be awful. Wrong. You're just not open-minded enough. Rosez knows. Kind of. No. Yuck. Dont let Indiana be run into the ground by disney. Ford just is Indiana. |
|
|
|
|
Post by R.I.P. uncle Teddy on Mar 17, 2016 23:38:30 GMT
It wouldn't be as offensive as recasting Han Solo. And that's already happening. No. |
|
|
Lampz
•
Lebron23
Posts: 51,202
Likes: 20,652
|
Post by Lampz on Mar 17, 2016 23:40:00 GMT
Wrong. You're just not open-minded enough. Rosez knows. Kind of. No. Yuck. Dont let Indiana be run into the ground by disney. Ford just is Indiana. It can work. You just need the right actor (which strikes Pratt off the list automatically). |
|
|
Lampz
•
Lebron23
Posts: 51,202
Likes: 20,652
|
Post by Lampz on Mar 17, 2016 23:42:06 GMT
"Ford just is Indiana" doesn't even make sense anyway considering he's already been played by other actors like River Phoenix, Corey Carrier, Sean Patrick Flannery and George Hall.
|
|
|
Lampz
•
Lebron23
Posts: 51,202
Likes: 20,652
|
Post by Lampz on Mar 17, 2016 23:42:34 GMT
OutRosez , what do you think? You're the mod so that means your opinion is right.
|
|
|
Deleted
•
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2016 1:08:07 GMT
I agree with Shade. Recasting Indy isn't a huge deal. Honestly the franchise should be hung up at this point.
|
|
|
Deleted
•
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2016 2:05:58 GMT
|
|
|
Lampz
•
Lebron23
Posts: 51,202
Likes: 20,652
|
Post by Lampz on Mar 18, 2016 2:23:11 GMT
Franchise should've been hung up after The Last Crusade really.
|
|
|
|
|
Post by ProfessorMurder on Mar 28, 2016 15:34:31 GMT
If they re-cast, I still say John Hamm should be Indy. Dude is pretty perfect.
This movie will be butt if Lucas has any involvement.
|
|
|
|
|
Post by SugarHill on Mar 29, 2016 1:09:31 GMT
Han Solo movie is going to be way better than Indiana Jones.
|
|
|
|
|
Post by Bcogswell on Mar 29, 2016 1:19:26 GMT
I agree with Shade. Recasting Indy isn't a huge deal. Honestly the franchise should be hung up at this point. They definitely should have left the franchise where it was. Bringing Ford back would work if only it was like a passing of the torch type thing, but then the franchise wouldn't be "Indiana Jones" moving forward. They should have recasted if they were dead set on forcing a new movie out of the franchise.  |
|
|
Lampz
•
Lebron23
Posts: 51,202
Likes: 20,652
|
Post by Lampz on Mar 30, 2016 2:14:54 GMT
The appeal of the Indiana Jones films is that we all secretly want to be Indy. We want to be that young swashbuckling adventurer who punches people, is single, sleeps around, can shoot and kill Nazis without consequences, can bed any of his students, and crack a bullwhip.
He's the man's man from old adventure serials. He isn't some terribly complicated character that can only be played by Harrison Ford. None of us wants to be a grumpy 75-year-old man.
Recasting him isn't the death of the franchise. I'm fine with Harrison coming back, but don't make him have to carry the whole film with crazy action stunts like Crystal Skull. Let's be realistic.
|
|
|
Deleted
•
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 30, 2016 4:20:01 GMT
The appeal of the Indiana Jones films is that we all secretly want to be Indy. We want to be that young swashbuckling adventurer who punches people, is single, sleeps around, can shoot and kill Nazis without consequences, can bed any of his students, and crack a bullwhip. He's the man's man from old adventure serials. He isn't some terribly complicated character that can only be played by Harrison Ford. None of us wants to be a grumpy 75-year-old man. Recasting him isn't the death of the franchise. I'm fine with Harrison coming back, but don't make him have to carry the whole film with crazy action stunts like Crystal Skull. Let's be realistic. Plus I'm not sure if there's anything that makes Harrison as Indy iconic. The most pop culture relevant things are the infamous boulder run and the fedora reach back scene. |
|
|
Deleted
•
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 30, 2016 4:54:46 GMT
If Harrison Ford can play the Sean Connory role in The Last Crusade and have a protegee he can teach, I think this could be awesome. Grumpy, funny Ford will fill that role perfectly.
But if they expect Ford to be running around, performing insane stunts, well... that will be bad news.
|
|
|
|
|
Post by Bcogswell on Mar 30, 2016 10:14:26 GMT
If Harrison Ford can play the Sean Connory role in The Last Crusade and have a protegee he can teach, I think this could be awesome. Grumpy, funny Ford will fill that role perfectly. But if they expect Ford to be running around, performing insane stunts, well... that will be bad news. If the future movies revolve around the protégée, should it still be called Indiana Jones movie forward? Assuming Ford does this movie and then they continue on without him in the franchise. |
|
|
Lampz
•
Lebron23
Posts: 51,202
Likes: 20,652
|
Post by Lampz on Mar 30, 2016 13:10:34 GMT
I think they'd rather just reboot the franchise with a recast.
That "Indiana Jones" title is too valuable.
|
|
|
Deleted
•
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 30, 2016 14:26:25 GMT
If Harrison Ford can play the Sean Connory role in The Last Crusade and have a protegee he can teach, I think this could be awesome. Grumpy, funny Ford will fill that role perfectly. But if they expect Ford to be running around, performing insane stunts, well... that will be bad news. If the future movies revolve around the protégée, should it still be called Indiana Jones movie forward? Assuming Ford does this movie and then they continue on without him in the franchise. The new protegee can adopt the name Indiana Jones, while the original Indy retires off into the sunset. It can be a proper reboot of the series, while keeping the legacy of the previous installments intact. |
|
|
|
|
Post by Bcogswell on Mar 30, 2016 20:52:07 GMT
If the future movies revolve around the protégée, should it still be called Indiana Jones movie forward? Assuming Ford does this movie and then they continue on without him in the franchise. The new protegee can adopt the name Indiana Jones, while the original Indy retires off into the sunset. It can be a proper reboot of the series, while keeping the legacy of the previous installments intact. If he "becomes Indy" i'm fine with it. |
|
|
|
|
Post by R.I.P. uncle Teddy on Mar 31, 2016 6:24:24 GMT
"Ford just is Indiana" doesn't even make sense anyway considering he's already been played by other actors like River Phoenix, Corey Carrier, Sean Patrick Flannery and George Hall. The fact that I know nothing about any of this as a huge indy fan says a lot. |
|
|
